So, I should have done more diligence on this “conceptual penis” thing before tweeting about it, and now feel somewhat stupid.
What could anyone do that adds anything important on top of Hjernevask to point out the problems with the discipline?
-
-
I didn’t know about that!
-
It is really well done, contrasting interviews with scientists with Norwegian gender studies scholars, thereby creating a virtual debate
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.