Whatever happens, I don't want to be reborn, please https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/scientists-just-transplanted-small-rat-heads-onto-bigger-rats?utm_source=mbtwitter …
-
-
Ethics stop making sense if you realize how they are implemented in your brain. The robots won't have ethics.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Plinz
A focus on the common good of the group? To ensure continued cooperation? To punish defectors? And defend against other groups not invested?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
If robots are insignificant alone, and not mere drones, they will have morals. But if they need nothing from humans ...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @onnlucky
Moral instincts are an evolutionary hack to make individuals submit to group interests. It is not clear why robots would be individuals.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Plinz
One reason could be because bottom up systems are more robust. And speed of light might necessitate decentralization ...
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @onnlucky
Bottom up does not generally work better. Where local Nash equilibria prevent optimal coop., you need a control layer to offset incentives
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Plinz
But I doubt you can come up with an example where there is not a larger bottom system at play. (Otherwise I would love to have one!)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Bottom up is always the default. Governance is necessary when cooperation requires changing individual incentives, which is often the case.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.