-
-
Replying to @vakibs
Mutually assured destruction is not a hard concept to grasp; this is not my primary worry.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @Plinz
What about the Cuban missile crisis ? There were many such close shaves.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @vakibs
The chance that people learn from what went wrong in the past is greater than getting them to act on future risks
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @Plinz
Very true. But I don't know what type of stupid blinking game these ill-tempered monkeys with many grudges can get to.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
We should consider increasing sophistication in foreign policy by financing shit like ISIS.
#Nuclearweapons don't prevent violence.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @vakibs
Nukes prevented wars between US and USSR, India and Pakistan, India and China, US and China, Israel and Arabs, US and North Korea...
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
hard to distinguish prevented from postponed... upped the anti for sure
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @overcomplete_ @vakibs
think of it like a game theoretic cost function. war usually happens if the benefits for one side outweigh the cost
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
where the cost functions are constantly recalculated and done by people who aren't great at maths/not psychic, got it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
or which have a different cost function from you and me @vakibs
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.