-
-
Replying to @vakibs
Mutually assured destruction is not a hard concept to grasp; this is not my primary worry.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @Plinz
What about the Cuban missile crisis ? There were many such close shaves.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @vakibs
The chance that people learn from what went wrong in the past is greater than getting them to act on future risks
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @Plinz
Very true. But I don't know what type of stupid blinking game these ill-tempered monkeys with many grudges can get to.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
We should consider increasing sophistication in foreign policy by financing shit like ISIS.
#Nuclearweapons don't prevent violence.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
My opinion is that if we take nuclear weapons off the table, these idiots will be forced to work together & build a basis for peace.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @vakibs
Sadly, it is the opposite. Nukes are the only reason why there is no war between them; they make war too costly.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
mutually assured destruction is not wisdom, but cold-war hysteria. History shows the "risks" http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-24280831 …
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
it is neither wisdom nor hysteria, but the product of local incentives @vakibs
-
-
local? Or global politics wt paranoid world leaders fulfilling their military industrial dreams of security by militarization
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.