if it is an epiphenomen you won't have to define it by definition, because it does not play any role in the causal structure
-
-
Replying to @Plinz
"An epiphenomenon is not to be defined by definition." You are probably joking.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Closed curves timelike create (could create) an equivalence between the class of classical computers and the class of...
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
... quantum computers. In addition, a quantum computer running in P can be simulated by a classical computer running in PSPACE.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
So, quantum computers would be no more powerful than classical computers. Hence the futility of the QC.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Now non-Turing epiphenomena could be reduced to Turing stuff through some (discrete) topologies associated with (discrete)...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
... hyperbolic spaces (deformations and autointersections of hyperbolic graphs). Causal sets are then plain.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
So, non-Turing would be an optical effect on Turing in an inappropriate space. The universe is reduced to a classical computer...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
... in a less smooth embedding. But warning: continuity has no place here. It's at best an cognitive approximation of...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
... discrete (our perception and the tools that we build around).
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
sure. no continuous space and time and state for the win!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.