Penrose's objection to AI entails an actual brain property violating Church-Turing, which would require new physics http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=2756#comment-1138275 …
-
-
Replying to @Plinz
is requiring new physics a desirable feature of a brain theory?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
-
Replying to @ActsOfPotential @mxorn
as scott aaronson candidly puts it: penrose demonstrates how crazy you must become to doubt the possibility of ai
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @Plinz
once I went to a conference in 'towards a science of consciousness'. Hameroff was there. I then drew this http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_3-n3cu77vvE/RrIEwn-WsLI/AAAAAAAAABA/qVNOudUpGLk/s1600-h/TSC.png …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Replying to @ActsOfPotential @mxorn
The vacuum created by an absence of methodology seems to fill itself with nuttery
2:30 PM - 8 Jun 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.