"metaphor free theory" is a good metaphor for a proper causal model, except that would be per definition computational
-
-
Replying to @Plinz @The_Lagrangian
actually computation is not compulsory. It's one way to implement it, and actually not the best mechanistic way
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @Plinz @The_Lagrangian
we have a big ass paper coming sometime this year with more
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @PsychScientists
Twitter is suboptimal. i am looking forward to the paper
@The_Lagrangian2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Plinz @The_Lagrangian
this may help a little: http://psychsciencenotes.blogspot.co.uk/2015/07/brains-dont-have-to-be-computers-purple.html …
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @PsychScientists
Thank you! I think the planimeter is a weak hypercomputer. Like to discuss?
@The_Lagrangian2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Plinz @The_Lagrangian
computation isn't even the most convenient *description* of it let alone explanation
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
btw i doubt that dyn sys approach gives you a convenient description here; you want classical mechanics @The_Lagrangian
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.