Radical skepticism eats itself: if part of a world-model predicts we cannot trust world-models, then we cannot trust that prediction either
-
-
Replying to @The_Lagrangian
@The_Lagrangian I am totally skeptical of this. :) Partial world models are not world models, and invalidation is possible.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @The_Lagrangian
@Plinz if we expect memories are from random fluctuation, we can't trust mems that formed model of universe under which this would occur1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @The_Lagrangian
@Plinz you can only invalidate models under the assumption that your experience at every moment is not fabricated or randomly generated2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @The_Lagrangian
@The_Lagrangian you are correct, unless my belief in your correctness is fabricated or randomly generated.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @The_Lagrangian
@The_Lagrangian Now I think logic is not the problem, but "feelings" about truth. Once you have a rational mode, it should supplant instinct2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@The_Lagrangian I think it is a model that seems to be logically consistent with experience. Most experiences seem to breed different models
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.