Art is not what it looks like, but what it is like
-
-
Replying to @pieceoplastic
@pieceoplastic Not always. Quite often, art is entirely an effect between observer and artifact.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pieceoplastic
@pieceoplastic But is not ok to disagree about art? It attempts to capture experience. Experience is diverse. (bad art is all appearance)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pieceoplastic
@Plinz By focusing on the intention the artist had, it is easiest to see the art for what it is, beyond my individual response to it.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pieceoplastic
@pieceoplastic We can project intentions only. Sometimes that is part of the experience. Sometimes the intention is just to initiate a state1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pieceoplastic
@Plinz The artist did have a clear intention, conscious or not, if we can sense that, we see art objectively, beyond individual response.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@pieceoplastic the art is always just between me and the substrate; all i know about the artist is part of me
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.