@Plinz I am disappointed with you. You are not engaging honestly in this discussion. You blatantly try to mislead & misrepresent.
-
-
Replying to @BernardoKastrup
@BernardoKastrup I honestly think that you are bullshitting yourself. The author even says that your conclusion is unwarranted!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BernardoKastrup
@Plinz You lost it, that's all there is to it. But I won't stop you digging a deeper hole for yourself.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BernardoKastrup
@BernardoKastrup Let us leave it at that, ok? Too emotional. I did not mean to insult or hurt you.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BernardoKastrup
@BernardoKastrup I am sorry that I am unable to tell you what you want to hear without being dishonest.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BernardoKastrup
@BernardoKastrup Please tell that to the reviewer of your paper after you submit it at a good journal.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @BernardoKastrup
@BernardoKastrup Ad hominem much?
1:37 PM - 27 Jan 2016
from Upper East Side, Manhattan
1 reply
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.