@Plinz for a millionth time: I never concluded what he denies. After tons of clarifications I can only conclude you are acting in bad faith.
-
-
Replying to @BernardoKastrup
@Plinz You lost it, that's all there is to it. But I won't stop you digging a deeper hole for yourself.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BernardoKastrup
@BernardoKastrup Let us leave it at that, ok? Too emotional. I did not mean to insult or hurt you.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BernardoKastrup
@BernardoKastrup I am sorry that I am unable to tell you what you want to hear without being dishonest.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BernardoKastrup
@BernardoKastrup Why? I am not the one whose philosophy apparently implies that subway maps are conscious.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Plinz
@Plinz Neither am I. This only goes to show how much you do NOT know or understand my philosophy. Read this:https://www.academia.edu/20313118/On_why_Idealism_is_superior_to_Physicalism_and_Micropsychism …2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BernardoKastrup
@BernardoKastrup I already responded to many of the apparent non-sequiturs in this elsewhere. I'm either not smart or not gullible enough :(1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@BernardoKastrup Many of the counterarguments I made already to the panpsychism text. It felt like a waste of time afterwards.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.