@Plinz @bengoertzel One of you may be able to comment on the map/territory distinction in classical logic vs intuitionism?
-
-
Replying to @FrameOfStack
@FrameOfStack@bengoertzel To a computationalist constructionist (like me), the notion of territory is reduced to a fancy pattern generator1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Plinz
@Plinz@bengoertzel Is the concept of truth meaningful to you, or somehow faulty? And the correspondence theory of truth?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @FrameOfStack
@FrameOfStack@bengoertzel Not outside of math, and no.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FrameOfStack
@Plinz It's not as if there's something that would make one view or the other true; it seems more like a choice of convention1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @FrameOfStack
@Plinz or maybe there's a fatal flaw in map-territory logic, which makes for a clear choice given the options2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes
@FrameOfStack There is no access to the territory itself. There is just a bit vector at the systemic interface of the interpreter.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.