@cupe_cupe @umruehren Note the positions on free speech, dress codes, self-expression in choice of games, innocence until proven guilty...
-
-
-
Replying to @cupe_cupe
@cupe_cupe@umruehren SJW; seems to be mostly 3rd wave feminists with intersectionality extensions, using identity/privilege tropes1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Plinz
@Plinz@umruehren again, using that word is like trying to appear unprejudiced while saying "world jew conspiracy" debating finance ethics2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cupe_cupe
@cupe_cupe Please don't pull a Godwin on me. You know that ATTAC has been called antisemitic for criticizing finance ethics?@umruehren1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Plinz
@Plinz@umruehren Was meant as an Illustration of the unintended effect the usage has, no other comparison intended.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cupe_cupe
@cupe_cupe What is a better term for the same group? (but since I am not a social constructionist, I'm not sure it matters)@umruehren2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Plinz
@Plinz@umruehren I don't know. "non-rational exaggerated activism"? Though in my view the group seems to be much smaller than in yours.5 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cupe_cupe
@cupe_cupe What about non-liberal socially constructionist left?@umruehren1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Plinz
@Plinz 1. Most are not completely constructionist. Gender may be ~80% construct in a person's view, other things less.@umruehren3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@cupe_cupe The crucial thing is: are you willing to accept arguments from anyone that could change your opinion? @umruehren
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.