@edfrenkel @Plinz But we can simulate billiard balls pretty well, we don't need to go subatomic for them. Do we need to for brains?
-
-
Replying to @henryseg1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
-
Replying to @edfrenkel
@edfrenkel Your brain is probably not made up of billiard balls, but cells that perform classical computations.@henryseg1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @edfrenkel
@edfrenkel May I respectfully return the favor? I am at least using words like "probably"...@henryseg2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Plinz
@Plinz@henryseg Perhaps, my views will become more clear if you watch my Aspen lecture, which I gave 2 months ago: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbLI9aX5eVg …4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @edfrenkel
@edfrenkel@Plinz Watching it now! I saw your@numberphile video related to this - sure you wouldn't be surprised that I wasn't convinced.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @henryseg
@henryseg I am not trying to convince you. Just giving you hints and sharing my experience. And then it's your choice.@Plinz@numberphile1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @edfrenkel
@edfrenkel@Plinz@numberphile I look forward to a time when we won't have to choose - we will know, one way or another.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @henryseg
.
@henryseg Don't you think life would be incredibly boring if we already "knew" everything?@Plinz@numberphile2 replies 3 retweets 4 likes
@edfrenkel BTW, life would still be great if we knew everything (we cannot); there are many more pleasure dimensions. @henryseg @numberphile
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.