@examachine Your faith items are irrelevant in an epistemological context, no?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @examachine
@examachine Continuous physics is just an attempt at unification, too. Why invest faith in what is a property of your formalism?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @examachine
@examachine Oh, yes! I also know the guy who has proven P=NP on USENET, a long time ago.5 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @examachine
@examachine I am unconvinced that you can prove these types of properties of the territory because of properties of your particular map.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @examachine
@examachine Given a continuous (hyper)computer, one could implement computation, and within it, digital physics, too.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.