Scott Aaronson on how to solve the problem of "online shaming of decent people": http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=2221
-
-
Replying to @AuerbachKeller
@AuerbachKeller He says some targets deserve to have their lives destroyed. I still wouldn't destroy him, but he clearly doesn't get it.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lbsasquatch
@lbsasquatch I think he writes that public shaming can be ok. It does not always destroy a life (think: Blair, or Bob Ford)@AuerbachKeller1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Plinz
@Plinz He writes "Don’t some targets of online shaming campaigns, y’know, deserve it? Of course!" http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=22211 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @lbsasquatch
@lbsasquatch That is not what he wrote. (Not for "saying the wrong thing", "life destroyed" was different context.)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lbsasquatch
@lbsasquatch I think he says that neither Sacco nor Richards deserved what they got. But what about this campaign? http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/10/scott-desjarlais-abortion-pro-life_n_1953136.html …2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@lbsasquatch Richards might be a not very nice and wise person, which might have made her unsuitable for her job. –But not deserving threats
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.