Unidirectional force drive? It would mean that we can power space craft without propellants. Also, it pwns Newton http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2014-07/31/nasa-validates-impossible-space-drive …
-
-
Replying to @Iteration23
@Iteration23 Are you a rocket scientist, or more a scientist for all things in general?@sunreign2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Plinz1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @Iteration23
@Iteration23 Let us hope that NASA sees the light and lets future studies be conducted by biologists@sunreign5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Iteration23
@Iteration23 The article in Wired is plenty cautious, and I do not see a need to go fecal. Did you grow up in a Heise-Forum?@sunreign2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Plinz
.
@Plinz Well@wiredscience sucks shit, scientifically speaking. It's sad and unneccessary, but true. Worse than TED and Wikipedia. Trash.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@Iteration23 Wired is not intended to be a scientific publication, Wikipedia is a community effort, and your language is unsuitable...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.