@cassierodenberg then you've learned the wrong lesson. You wrote an article which posited something ridiculous and refuted by the research.
-
-
Replying to @GordyPls
@GordyPls@cassierodenberg I don't think the problem is the disagreement, but the lack of respect and civility in the discussion1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Plinz
@Plinz@cassierodenberg you need striking distance of a sensible article to earn civility. This, climate skeptics and 9/11 truthers are out.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GordyPls
@GordyPls@cassierodenberg ALL meaningful discourse requires civility. & not agreeing on societal impact of game violence is not insensible2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Plinz
@Plinz@cassierodenberg I think where we diverge is you consider this conversation meaningful discourse1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GordyPls
@GordyPls@cassierodenberg I think were we diverge is what constitutes a valid mode of public interaction between non-evil people1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Plinz
@Plinz@cassierodenberg you think angry negative reactions to those providing public commentary that is misleading is "evil"?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GordyPls
@GordyPls@cassierodenberg In the given case, I believe that it is not conducive to making the world a better place in any conceivable way.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Plinz
@Plinz@cassierodenberg you've a similar tare on your measurements of "evil" as Ms Rodenberg if "not helping" counts mate.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.