We will observe ourselves creating AGI, and see the AGI creating a simulation to understand its own nature and its past, and that simulation will contain us, observing ourselves creating AGI; there is no way of knowing how deep into the loop we are
-
-
Once more my friend: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4XT-l-_3y0 … ;=) ... I mean, I'm not sure how you're defining "contradictions in the semantics...." Formal semantics of infinite sets etc. appear formally consistent. Do you mean "conceptually inconsistent with your intuition?" ...
-
It is a fascinating truth that using languages involving the Unconstructable and Unknowable, often provides the most concise route (relative to human-mind Occam prior) to getting from human sense-data to practical conclusions about building stuff in human physical reality.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.