This "HIV insert" paper needs to be revisited with the understanding that genomic sequences could have been altered to create the same protein sequence. Also, two of the "HIV sequences" found exposed on SARS-CoV-2 are from the same loop structure HIV's gp120 domain.https://twitter.com/QqTesla/status/1223694876799197184 …
-
Show this thread
-
Andre Watson 🧬 💊 💉 Retweeted Andre Watson 🧬 💊 💉
We were all so quick to discount these results because the genomic sequences didn't match. Then I saw this:https://twitter.com/nanogenomic/status/1259983240674213888?s=20 …
Andre Watson 🧬 💊 💉 added,
Andre Watson 🧬 💊 💉 @nanogenomicAssuming the data presented is factual, I find the following evidence to be convincing enough for me. There is NO WAY that a virus could naturally have more than 150 mutations across an 800 RNA letter stretch, where none of those changes in the code result in a different protein. https://twitter.com/LadonPrumt/status/1259841455088164864 … pic.twitter.com/qMMV6UNt1NShow this thread1 reply 1 retweet 3 likesShow this thread -
Why change RNA letters without changing protein letters? Becuase you can change the genetic code without changing the protein code and structure. Also, people running comparisons between viruses are only looking at RNA and DNA letters, typically matching ≥7 letters (NCBI BLAST).
2 replies 1 retweet 5 likesShow this thread
Replying to @nanogenomic
What does the sequence code for, and what is its origin?
7:13 PM - 11 May 2020
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.