I think “quantum entanglement” is a bad name because there is precisely no entanglement. It should be called “quantum telepathy” because one particle suffers something (pathos) on account of another that is at a distance (tele-) from it.
-
-
Quantum ignoramus here. Do we know with certainty or any probability that no influence beyond our detection is occuring, or is this another case of "shut up and calculate"?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.