"No evidence" is a stretch. There are different studies with macaques and rhesus monkeys that suggest immunity. Plus a bounty of anecdotal evidence. That's not nothing. It may not be conclusive, but there is *some* evidence to suggest it.
-
-
-
Yes, there is always evidence, and saying "there is no evidence" is bad wording. But there is currently substantial evidence that we won't get herd immunity, and we should not bank on it.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Huh. This is weird. But then what do I know about viruses?
-
A lot of other coronaviruses causing common cold don't give you immunity, so you can get infected again after a few weeks
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
The evidence that survivors become immune is that that is how it works for (almost?) every other virus. This seems like another case where 'no evidence' is misleading because what they really mean is that no one has run a controlled experiment to test it yet.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
das weiß ich nicht
- 2 more replies
-
-
-
yep. this article sounds pretty bad:https://www.news-medical.net/news/20200413/Novel-coronavirus-attacks-and-destroys-T-cells-just-like-HIV.aspx …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How does someone not develop at least temporary immunity and recover? How do the plasma treatments work in this case? I don't understand this concept but often see it repeated.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.