Yeah naturally. I rarely care much for conclusions. I'm grateful for the mountains of data, though.
-
-
-
Each discipline has its own way of generating data, it's usually important to understand how the sensors are constructed and calibrated, where and when they are deployed, and how the signals are filtered.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
science is destined to be myopic— yet the best chance for the future
@scifri So, with this blindness in mind I let go of scientific consensus long ago, (considering it a mathematical pair of blinders, which has, ironically, a compound consensus effect) and I groupthink on my own. -
Eventually, one can only understand the depths of a scientific discipline if they understand the shared AND individual ideas of their leading thinkers.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
For the latter statement I think you're missing the /s
-
I was hoping that it would be obvious enough.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
why can academics flawlessly do this?
-
i thought that calling 'scientific consensus' 'good groupthink' was already tongue in cheek enough
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
‘Flawlessly’
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
