I'd slightly rephrase it to "don't use condoms unless your partner is ovulating or known to have an STD".
-
-
-
[logically correct but also obvious, so i felt absurdity is better]
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They do provide protection, but only for professional sex workers, where they are properly fitted in a lengthy process. The general public should instead wash their genitals often with soap & water, and engage in sexual distancing.
-
Meanwhile, pregnancy tests will only be administered if you are noticeably pregnant or can prove that you've been in contact with someone who's pregnant
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Our covid19 response is abstinence-only education.https://twitter.com/MimeticValue/status/1244481880096833538 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
BREAKING NEWS: WHO reports raw dogging vs condoms data is inconclusive. Further funding has been requested to continue the study.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Free Truvada for everyone! Everything not curable is a rounding error or you’ve already got it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A Trojan horse...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
300 have sex without contraception vs. 600 have sex with condoms on.
Which scenario leads to more pregnancies and STDs?
