Jesus. How is this possible? @michaelzlin https://twitter.com/CNBC/status/1242207387215421445 …
I noticed that your assessment (in the slides) of the life of the virus on surfaces is a lot shorter than what I read elsewhere. Eg, you put it at 1h on cardboard, other sources at 24h? Do you think that the survival rate of the virus is overestimated by most sources?
-
-
Thx for the question Joscha. I had a mixup between sars1 and sars2 virus on one version of the slidedeck. 10% survival on cardboard is 4-8h for sars-cov-2. This corrected in the current version (pinned post).
-
Is 90% reduction in viral load enough to consider it safe?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.