Good point! (I think that over a long enough timespan, it would produce some selection pressure, since it is too infectious and severe at the same time.)
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @falafelsy @jingle__belle
I find it fascinating. My everyday thoughts are more horrible than this.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @falafelsy @jingle__belle
Me, too. At some point I concluded that the demise of the species is inevitable, due to the industrial revolution, but that without this terrible decision, we would not be so comfortably alive and talking and understanding things. We are lucky to be born so close to the end.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Our demise would have been inevitable but for the industrial revolution. We existed for 1 - 3 hundred thousand years perhaps without population growth, without much in the way of technology growth. Then our demise seemed inevitable.
1 reply 2 retweets 2 likes -
The reason that our population was stable was that we were sustainable
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Limited to a shitty standard of life, limited to the Earth, believing in crazy magical thinking, dying young, dying whilst birthing, dying from a scratch from a stick. No thanks!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
We are not quite the same species as 50,000 years ago. We are the domesticated version.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.