Interesting exercise: before publicly disagreeing with someone, try to figure out on how many levels of modeling their argument rests. To resolve the disagreement, you will usually both need to get at least one level higher.
Hm, my experience differs! When I am not lucid, I lack attention to go deep enough, but when I am I can identify the construction of the aesthetics that informs my preferences, and the generators for such constructions need only information theoretically constrained assumptions.
-
-
Let’s go concrete to get to the bottom of this then. My number one intrinsic value is ‘Love’ - I call it my compass. Why do I find it of value? I just do. The query bottoms out and I can go no further. Many other things like respect, compassion etc are a means to that ends.
-
Ah, that implies you cannot see how you construct love?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The point is that I <don’t> construct it. As a value, it’s not just an idea, and it’s not just an oxytocin experience either. For me, it’s some kind of tangible intangible. I completely accept that this is my subjective experience and others may differ, but for me it is real.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.