These 2 things are not distinct. They are both '1st person' experiences(1PP). That is the single underlying explanandum. That one is generated by complex emotional states, another by sensory transduction, and another by cognitive processes is moot. It's all 1PP.
-
-
-
Sorry, I don’t make the rules. I am just telling how it is
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Dude, what?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think I just experienced phenomenal consciousness as I became your 10,000th follower
pic.twitter.com/E4IGxFFAlP
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Plz make more videos
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Switching between them is possible in both directions, right?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
The phenomena that are presented as the contents of attention appear to just be higher resolution presentations of what is outside of attention. Attention may only 'qualify' qualia, and/or provide more detailed access, even to thoughts (cogitative qualia).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think, The Logical or emotional perception of anything changes perspectives. I notice most people can’t separate the two and it creates unnecessary angry emotional disagreements. It makes conversing with most people very difficult for me

-
I’m curious if at the very concrete moment one must always pass through the perception phase before attaining the symbolic one. Memories and emotions are important I guess...
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.