A true intellectual cabal is not defined by the way in which we understand things, but by the level at which we don’t understand things.
-
-
-
Replying to @gumpp
Yes, but at which level does your not understanding begin?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Plinz
At the etymological level. Also without context it’s hard to understand what “true” means. I probably need to read your papers/book first.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gumpp
So you are still considering yourself to be an etymologist instead of a an epistemologist, ontologist, metaphysicist or metaphysician?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Plinz
good question… I consider myself a metaphysicist and information theory fanboy. Etymology has never been my thing. How about you?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @gumpp
If I am trying to heal open sores, infections and broken functionality in the metaphysics: does that make me a metaphysician?
3:25 AM - 8 Feb 2020
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.