Thanks Professor! But the other part is also true. The really interesting disruptive stuff from Mavericks that should sail into high impact journals is blocked at the gate. Peer review accomplishes both evils: blessing resume padding and protecting rent seekers from innovators.https://twitter.com/DavidBCollum/status/1225624483920273408 …
-
-
Academia is no longer a global hivemind dedicated to systematically pursuing truth. Some of its disciplines are infertile, others unhinged. We may need to force it into coherence. It should be possible to simulate and empirically test the outcomes of different evaluation regimes.
-
Do you have a preferred evaluation regime / criteria? One that worked in the past? Something new? It’s a promising development that the discussion is taking place, more and more, by people who are in the know.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.