There is no reason to expect that the algorithms that we employ to solve problems in the computer are the same algorithms that evolution has invented for brains. There is no evidence that there is only one way to arrive at general intelligence.
In the same way, you load the concept of 'world' with unexamined baggage: you don't know this world beyond the functionality that is revealed to the embedded observer. The CTT suggests that all substrates have the same power.
-
-
Turing equivalence only says that two different machines can implement the same algorithm. GI is a set of algorithms. CTT says nothing about the equivalence of a set. There may be many sets of GI algorithms. We know of only one set.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.