I guarantee that won't happen :) You can't discover meaning if you don't represent knowledge, let alone multimodal grounds of knowledge. Also, you can't manipulate knowledge without having a cognitively powerful filtering mechanism. Both points are the essence of my papers. :)
What matters is not what opinion you hold, but what arguments support it. I don’t understand your prerequisite of “universal, grounded knowledge”. Are you sure your epistemology is sound?
-
-
I do show that in my next article, where I talk about how LeCun's continuous functions are not actually continuous, (they are, mathematically) but not cognitively. Because the function's domain is limited by the range of values that the probability distribution of the data take.
-
Let me quote William Briggs: "Mathematical equations are lifeless creatures; they do not “come alive” until they are interpreted, so that probability cannot be an equation. It is a matter of our understanding. […] Mathematical statistics does not withstand interpretation of the
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.