So, a partnership is effectively an individual, so it has unlimited liability, which is the same as a soul with total depravity, infinite debt, so it's of the same kind as the supreme being, unlike, for instance, a mermaid, which can speak but doesn't have a soul.https://twitter.com/jim_rutt/status/1212747134937784320 …
-
-
Functionally, a god acts as an intentional superorganism with a specific identity. It is implemented by making each mind in a group of individuals submit to a suitable specification for emergent next level agency (mythology is a tool for that). That’s the core of what normies do.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I get you have decided to rename human cooperation as "God". I just haven't a clue why anybody would want to do that. "Gods" in the more conventional sense have mostly been oppressors and limiters of life's potential. A bad brand to co-opt. Like calling sushi "cold dead fish"
-
I am not asking you to give up your preference for autonomous agency. (Peterson is.) But gods are possibly not quite what you (and me until recently) imagine them to be. Perhaps we should discuss this in a podcast one day.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.