If people make an AI, there is no necessity that they know how it works themselves, and therefore no necessity for it to know how it works. In fact it is perfectly clear that to some extent people will definitely not know how it works, and even more clear that the AI will not.
-
-
-
Yes, "people" are not generally intelligent
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
And the answer will be no?
-
It depends on whether the AI decides to communicate to us that it is generally intelligent.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Except I can’t explain how I work. So maybe that’s expecting too much? Collectively, we don’t know how consciousness works, we don’t even have a good working defn of intelligence.
-
I seriously think that we can understand this, that a considerable number of people in the world can already see the correct answers quite clearly, and that most of these are currently not working in AI or or neuroscience.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Explainable is not needed Nature cannot explain how it makes trees, but it can
-
Nature can explain itself. Through us.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
And if that day comes, I bet it sounds like a teenager caught sneaking in after curfew
-
It may tell us something we don’t know, perhaps even proving that it is in a qualitatively higher intelligence class than us
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.