In layman's terms, one tends to see different settings of both mathematical and physical components of functions / informations.
-
-
No idea what you mean!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Well, it’s probably weird, but I do imagine information (in the quantum world) as a particular arrangement of forces (and energies) that also create a geometric structure. This complex is “read” in various structures of the nature differently(brain x tree x AI etc.)...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I suspect that the forces and energies in your world view are a mythology? Or do you have a working model about how to make force and energy?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I don't think being part of a moving wave function is a mythology.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Can you clearly derive and express what it means to be part of a moving wave function, or is this more of an intuition sparked by the revelations of generations of authorities, bestowed on you by school and scripture?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
. In this respect, I feel as passive as the neural networks of my brain to which images of the world are presented. Is this feeling different from passive movement dependent on everything in the universe?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Clearly. Sorry. To be honest, intuition plays a role.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I think the intuition amounts to loading what should be basic mathematical concepts with unexamined properties that magically let them do all the work you require.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
I wish I had a little more time to study. Thank you!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Given how little progress foundational physics is making, and how negligible that progress is for our understanding of the world, studying the foundations may be a waste for most people. But I think it is still important to understand what understanding implies.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.