Not sure there is morality without ‘others’? So which group, not whether.
-
-
-
My point exactly. You are probably identified as a group mind, on the normative level. And you are perhaps not even trying to imagine what it is like to be not?
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thank you!!! This is excellent. I noticed the fundamental split between agreeable and disagreeable personalities, and share the fundamental disagreement. But I know the state of unity. I also think that hiveminders are less conscious, but not all of them lack apperception.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
The question is not whether you deduce the Categorical Imperative from the constraints set by your desired aesthetics or not. What's relevant is that your ethics are contingent on your own integrity and rationality, not on the approval of the highest ranks of the ingroup.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Yes, people should be morally autonomous. Where's moral in acting based on what morals you expect others to have or match what's around you spacially? There's no moral without self-responsibility. It's you and the incorruptible laws of the universe.
-
While it would be lovely that most people had the intellectual wherewithal to be morally autonomous, they don't, nor do most care. That leaves us with moral interdependence and imposed moral responsibility.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
-
Expressed / declared autonomy. There exist yet another way to do it.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.