Sounds like a “user interface” for a biological robot, when you put it like that. But the idea is attractive. Have you written a paper along these lines?
Who is "us"? Do you attempt to build a community of people who are confused enough to think that they can first "measure" and even "quantify", and then "empirically define" consciousness? You literally don't know what you are talking about.
-
-
The Community of the Confused. I agree, empirical definitions of consciousness might be impossible. Such complexity might very well be beyond our ability to quantify. But regardless of your opinion on this matter, there are many, many people who are unwilling to just give up.
-
I don't suggest to give up. I am just not sure if you are thinking clearly enough right now to understand the existing work on the problem. For example, I am not sure if you understand 'complexity', and its relationship to 'quantification', and whether that is relevant here.
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
You can measure a system's capacity to model and exploit models of the environment which is sensing and cognition, quantify and measure emotional drivers of behavior, as well as quantify and measure behaviors in an environment. What else about consciousness needs explaining?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.