If your theory of consciousness contains a Hard Problem, it means that you recognize that your theory does not work.
-
-
Replying to @Plinz
No, this is like saying "if your theory of QM has a measurement problem, it means you recognize that your theory doesn't work." No one's theory works, that's why it's a problem!
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @NeuroMyths
If no one's theory [in any given domain] works, it means that no one has a working theory, no?
3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @Plinz @NeuroMyths
The “hard problem” is only a problem for those who fail to place organismic affect (homeostatic, emotional affect) at the foundation of their model. Once you conceptualize subjective experiences as an emergent characteristic of affect, the hard problem vanishes completely.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
To be replaced by the problem of claiming that a "conceptualisation of subjective experiences as an emergent characteristic of affect" bears any connection to what our actual subjective experiences actually are.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @chrisfcarroll @SimsYStuart and
more generally, having a Hard Problem is rather better than not noticing that you have a Problem.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Now mapping the precise causal mechanisms (neurochemical and neuroarchitectural) which elaborate brainstem affect into cortical subjective experience is certainly a very, very hard problem. But that problem is not a conceptual problem. It’s just a problem of system complexity.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
The conceptual problem that I see, is mapping a '3rd person' description of a brain to 1st person subjective experience. There is no such mapping?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
I don’t think that the functional implementation of the mind and the conscious self exist in the same frame of reference. From the perspective of the self, phenomenal experience is primary, outside of it, there is no experience. The self is a story, the mind a story generator.
3 replies 1 retweet 11 likes -
Replying to @Plinz @chrisfcarroll and
The term "representation" seems more accurate than "story". Story has a connotation of being entirely made up. A representation, otoh, is a fitted curve.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Yes, but you need to fit your curves in many dimensions, including the temporal one, which requires successive branching expansion over states in an event calculus, which I would call stories, because that's more concise than 'directed graph of the succession of events' or so.
-
-
Replying to @Plinz @chrisfcarroll and
Just brainstorming other words for the nearly same thing: description, replica, adaptive computation, model, interpretation, approximation, abstraction, rendition, theory, hypothesis, estimate. "Temporal model" may be the closest thing without connotation of fake.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mere_mortise @chrisfcarroll and
In "Principles of Synthetic Intelligence", I decided to call this type of representations 'episodic scripts', which composed and connected scenes containing objects and transitions.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.