This is quite different from current understandings of leftism as wokeness, and rightism as redpilledness. Wokeness is a very specific lens on the world, and redpilledness the inversion that results from breaking that lens.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But those two isms live in a world with finite resources
-
Yes. The question is whether it is a world with sufficient resources. War is wasteful and has terrible aesthetics.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
The (interesting version of the) right wing position isn't that the ingroup should be small, it's that it *is* in fact small due to human psychology, and anyone who thinks their ingroup is truly universal is deluded
-
Yes. There is often a trajectory from left to right as people grow older. Even if you have strong leftist preferences, you tend to learn that not everyone is willing to compromise with you.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
“There are two types of people in this world... set theorists, and non set theorists... and I’m one of the latter.” (Or something like that)
#selfReference#paradox If we give up consistency in mathematics, incompleteness is not implied, and anything is possible



-
Everybody is me in a different timeline, but many versions of me are effing dense
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Btw, I don't claim that my value preference is the correct position. It is just what I observe to be my value preference.
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Would be interested in your take on this conversation between
@peternlimberg and I on the topic of "memetic mediation"https://letter.wiki/conversation/241 …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
