The chances of getting a Cartesian to care about HoTT are approximately zero.
You mean you know you could potentially discover that you are conscious in actuality, functionalism is an untenable framework, and existence some kind of conspiracy? That’s a pretty heavy claim to make!
-
-
No, I don't think I could discover that. I'm confident in my views, and I'll defend them robustly. (I think I do.) But I also know I'm fallible. And I think it's good to have rival views clearly and robustly stated, so that the community can make an informed decision.
-
I sometimes wonder if this community is the olympus or the special olympics of philosophy. None of the alternatives (like consciousness realism and panpsychism) work. If you present illusionism humbly as an “often neglected” family of theories, you may be understating the case.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.