If the Penrose/ Hameroff microtubule theory of consciousness and information processing is correct, then I believe that it's a misnomer to consider current versions of AI as the same type of system. Perhaps later with quantum computing, in theory it could be.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Discovery does not rely on understanding all implications. Physical principles exist without biological realizations. Knowing birds might help designing aeroplanes but it is not a necessary pre-condition.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nah. You cannot think about self-driving cars? Or pets, or who knows what? I will not be reduced to the level of an AI, a clever use of software but not human :-)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Question is: should you?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
When Dawkins wrote the Selfish Gene he liberated us from that same "you illusion". IMO the best AI researchers are doing the same today.
-
What is the you illusion from which you have been liberated?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Is this statement of equivalence an expression of a eliminativism view of consciousness à la Dennett? Presumably, as a non-eliminativist I can think about AI as something different to myself
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thats the whole point!!!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.