Did it occur to you that if superintelligent AI turns out not to do what humans want that it is more likely correct than us?
-
-
Replying to @Plinz
Well, „correct“ is about ethics here, rigtht? I observe very little correlation between the ethical dimension of behavior and intelligence in humans. This makes me reluctant to follow your argument.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zerology
Do you have data to support your observations? (Afaik higher intelligence is positively correlated with more prosocial behavior)
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Yes, higher intelligence is more prosocial, as it better models problems and solutions in a complex 3D way. Which is why an actual AI will be good at serving human needs/wants.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @thewiseturtle @zerology
That seems to be a non sequitur. Higher intelligence is not always more pro social, and there is no guarantee that it will benefit humans.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I say that to solve a problem "with intelligence" generally means to solve a problem using the current states and goals states of larger group, as well as of the individuals in the group, so that the "solution" isn't failing someone. Not all groups have humans. But most do.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
While low agreeableness can act as a good filter in f2f interactions, I found that it gets consistently bad results online. Don't poison the ether.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.