The concept of social media as the Fifth Estate may be the most enduring part of Zuck's speech yesterday. As the Fourth Estate, the press self-conceptualizes its role as holding society accountable. As the Fifth Estate, social media is how society holds the press accountable.
-
Show this thread
-
In a sense this is how things already work, though it’s usually characterized negatively. Journalists publish & social media provides immediate accountability. It’s the comments section that can’t be shut down, the critic that can’t be shut up. Unless you censor social media…pic.twitter.com/6OwUeFzScb
7 replies 41 retweets 187 likesShow this thread -
The issue is bigger than Facebook, as big as it is. It extends to every platform that provides people a voice. Should tech companies accede to demands from their direct competitors (namely media companies) to censor millions of users? Or should they stand for free speech?
16 replies 61 retweets 334 likesShow this thread -
Of course social media has contributed to all kinds of issues. Polarization, online mobs, riots, offline violence. But it’s also given a voice to billions. You can’t take that voice away. It’s like disenfranchising someone.
3 replies 27 retweets 168 likesShow this thread -
The right to voice is as important as the right to vote.
3 replies 27 retweets 178 likesShow this thread -
You can’t have an “informed citizenry” if citizens can’t inform other citizens.
4 replies 29 retweets 162 likesShow this thread -
If a plebiscite was held, few people would want to give up their own right to voice on social media. They may want to silence someone else, but they would not want to give up their own right. Nor should it be taken away without good reason and due process.
3 replies 26 retweets 151 likesShow this thread -
In the long term, I think the outcome of this “debate” over whether the masses should have a voice is already preordained. End-to-end encryption and crypto will see to that. We’re just buying time till the cavalry comes.
5 replies 28 retweets 190 likesShow this thread -
Future historians will write about how this last ditch anti-speech Luddism was doomed from the start. You can’t put the genie back in the bottle. You won’t take away the voices newly gained by billions. Because to be against technology is to be on the wrong side of history.
22 replies 53 retweets 307 likesShow this thread
You may be too optimistic here. Many social media companies are now embracing the idea that the public marketplace of ideas needs careful shepherding. Getting dissident social media platforms off the ground has become difficult as well.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.