Humanity does not destroy nature. Greta is not looking at the right time scale. Humanity is nature's way to increase atmospheric carbon, eventually turning biologically inert carbon deposits into beautiful sugars.
-
-
I've often thought that - though that's only the case if life spontaneously started here and wasn't otherwise deposited.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is this Open Individualism? The boundary between subjects of experience, as opposed to the boundary between agents, is a tricky and non-trivial problem. I think at least in an Empty Individualist view, life causes a lot of victims in the form of "moments of experiencing pain".
-
Which of the three main views of personal identity - open, empty, and closed, is more accurate in your view? I assume you probably start with "the state-space of possible programs" and then carve useful notions of identity from it.https://qualiacomputing.com/2018/07/23/open-individualism-and-antinatalism-if-god-could-be-killed-itd-be-dead-already/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.