There is a deeper point in this. Solving AI requires integrating everything there is to know into a single coherent model. If a philosopher or AI critic does not have such a model for the domain of intelligence itself, they'll fail to achieve full coherence in arguing against AI.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well, the No Free Lunch Theorems Kind of enforce this, don't they? So isn't the central question of AI how we humans manage to seem to defy them?
-
Few universes have the required properties to contain us. When making predictions, we usually only need to pick from among those.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.