Good/bad give rise to a system of meaning that most people find more powerful and convincing than true/false.
Yes, which is only true if you add additional premises that imply that truth is better (for instance, you may want to have the best possible regulation and need to show that your model has a chance of being isomorphic to a ground truth, or you prefer truth for aesthetic reasons).
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
To state that going astray from truth (i.e. accepting false statements as true) is bad rather than merely factually descriptive requires additional preferences. I don't think that is inconsistent.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.