I don’t. I have my own socialization, but I am unable to understand other people if I cannot disengage from it and emulate theirs. The idea of a corect moral universalism that has been discovered just now, but was obscured in 1950 does not make sense.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I am sorry if I misunderstood your question.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I wouldn't care to apply that rule of thumb to matters of grave injustice?
-
In one sense, justice is a set of codified algorithms to arbitrate conflicts in a society. In another, it is the expression of social values. In the latter sense, the sensation of injustice depends on socialization.
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I find regularly switching sides helps you understand both when there is no correct answer.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
The phrase “emotionally unable to understand” is a little vague, to me. Can you more fully explain and define what you mean?
-
Sounds like inability to empathise to me.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.