Ideally we'll have a system where the entire process of research is open to the public, so there can be everyone-including-peer preview, comments, and review. Basically, I think the norm can be an open process from start to finish (ish).
-
-
-
This is already the case on Arxiv and similar publication models. The process is not entirely without gates, but they are not institutional. (Every party beyond a certain size is only as good as the bouncers.)
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.