I have no idea what you are trying to say and if your words even mean anything.
-
-
I would agree that mathematics gives us access to a minimally phenomenological 'common sense' that cuts across many modalities, but to varying degrees. Math is like 'monoaesthetic phenomenology'...least colorful colors but not blindness (anesthetic).
-
As long as you are maintaining the phenomenological angle on math your are missing the point. It is like thinking that the point of the financial system of of baking bricks is how they feel to you.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
If something had no phenomenological aspect we would not be able to detect it or conceive of it. (Back to the Cartesian interaction problem). There are two explanatory gaps to get to qualia - 1 rational & 1 empirical.
-
There is no explanatory gap. You perceive gaps because your explanation bottoms out in phenomenology, and then you try to build everything on top of that.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.