Corporations and nation states are governed by teams but usually led by individuals because rules for regulating an organization are too difficult to express explicitly in full, and have to be embodied by a human in the loop. The same problem makes it hard to select that human.
-
-
Replying to @Plinz
Are you aware of any attempts at a formalized language for representing coordination patterns, for the purpose you're referring to?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chophshiy
The traditional one is usually called Legalese, but it requires many years of study to parse properly, and it typically only captures exception handling. A formalization of organizational telos via value declarations and codes of conduct seems to be naive and too easy to subvert.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Plinz
Yeah, no. Specifying laws in a natural language should be illegal.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chophshiy
Fully formal languages are presently insufficient to represent complex phenomena in a human mind. We can only do simple things, like the Riemann hypothesis or learning how to play Go...
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Plinz
I agree. We need to get the AI/ML folks some smelling salts.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
The AI/ML folks I know are fully aware of that. If you spend your days beating weighted sums into shape until they string a few pixels into the interpretation of a moving car, you get a strong sense of how hard it is to learn a model of human interaction and make it interpretable
-
-
Replying to @Plinz
I maintain it isn't as complicated as it's made out to be. It seems to me that most are trying too hard to make it complicated because that's what they've been taught to expect.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.